| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Harris v. Blockbuster Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc.
''Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc.'', 622 F.Supp.2d 396 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2009)〔http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/Blockbusterdecision.pdf〕 established precedent in the district that
when a contract has a clause that authorizes one party to make changes to the "contract" without notification, that it is illusory and hence the entire "contract" is void.
==Judgment==
On April 15, 2009, the District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled that Blockbuster Online’s Terms and Conditions were unenforceable because they gave Blockbuster too much discretion in modifying the terms of the agreement. Following the reasoning in a Fifth Circuit case, Morrison v. Amway Corp., and consistent with a Ninth Circuit case, ''Douglas v. US District Court ex rel Talk America''〔No. 06-75424 (9th Cir. July 18, 2007)〕 the court found that Blockbuster’s arbitration provision was illusory, because there was nothing in the Terms and Conditions that would prevent Blockbuster from “unilaterally changing any part of the contract.”
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|